Details
Written by: RJ
The CFBP has an interesting article about the devaluation of rewards points.
Today’s circular warns that companies may violate federal law when they:
Devalue earned rewards: Consumers make decisions on whether to open or use a credit card based on the value of card benefits and rewards conveyed by a company’s advertising and other communications. If the company later deflates the value of a customer’s accrued awards, this may be an unfair or deceptive practice resembling a bait-and-switch scheme.
Hide the conditions for earning or keeping rewards: Fine print disclaimers or vague terms buried in a contract may unlawfully conflict with prominent promotional language advertising the rewards consumers can earn. Companies may also illegally rely on fine print to cancel valuable rewards that consumers have already earned. If consumers’ receipt of rewards is revoked, canceled, or prevented based on buried or vague conditions, that may be an unfair or deceptive act or practice.
Fail to deliver promised benefits: Companies operating rewards programs are responsible for ensuring consumers can redeem the rewards they have earned, including coordinating with merchant partners and vendors. If system failures result in consumers losing points when attempting to redeem, this may be considered an unfair or deceptive practice.
Thoughts
Interesting read. The choice of words “partners and churning” stand out to me. As we see most devaluations happen with travel partner products. Churning also stands out, granted I’m bias.